Hp 156 Hd Notebook Intel Core I5-8250u Processor Review
HP EliteBook 840 G5 (i5-8250U, SSD, Full Hard disk drive) Laptop Review
A lot of changes! After HP only gave its business notebook a quick brush-up last yr, a lot of changes have been fabricated to the new EliteBook 840. There is the Kaby Lake Refresh processor and a new example redesign. This does not necessarily mean that new is e'er better. Observe out what changes have been fabricated and how the new concern companion fares in our fix of tests below.
The HP EliteBooks of the 800 series are premium business notebooks that position themselves just beneath meridian models such as the HP EliteBook Page 1040 G4. Today, we will be taking a look at the fifth-generation of the HP EliteBook 840, which has been given a technical and optical overhaul and is quite different from its predecessor, the HP EliteBook 840 G4.
Our test unit of measurement (model number 3JX66EA) is positioned in the middle field compared to devices from other manufacturers. It is equipped with an upward-to-date Intel Core i5-8250U with viii GB of RAM, a 256-GB NVMe SSD and a Full Hard disk IPS display. Our test configuration of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is available for $1400 and also offers many security features, which business devices cannot go without nowadays.
Alternatively, the device tin can also be equipped with a faster Intel Core i7-8650U, although this bumps the cost up quite a scrap. At that place is another, cheaper version of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 in the configuration with the Intel Core i5-7200U. Withal, this model offers significantly lower performance compared to eighth-generation chips. There are besides dissimilar storage device and RAM configurations available. According to the technical specifications, the maximum is a 1-TB SSD and 32 GB of RAM.
Will these changes suffice to beat the competition? The probably toughest competitor is the Lenovo ThinkPad T480s, which has a similar configuration. All comparison devices, including our exam unit of measurement'due south predecessor, can exist establish in the tabular array below.
| HP EliteBook 840 G4 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | Dell Latitude 7480 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 | Acer TravelMate P648 | |
| CPU | Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Cadre i5-7200U | Intel Core i7-7600U | Intel Cadre i7-8550U | Intel Core i7-7500U |
| GPU | Intel Hd Graphics 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Hd Graphics 620 | Intel Hard disk drive Graphics 620 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Hd Graphics 620 |
| Display | xiv-inch 1920 ten 1080 (TN) | fourteen- inch 2560 10 1440 (IPS) | fourteen-inch 1920 x 1080(IPS) | 14-inch 1920 x 1080 (IPS) | 14-inch 2560 ten 1440 (IPS) | 14-inch 1920 x 1080(IPS) |
| RAM | viii GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | 8 GB DDR4 | sixteen GB DDR4 | viii GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 256 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD |
| Rating | 87% | 91% | 87% | 87% | 90% | ninety% |
Memory
8192 MB
, DDR4-2400, 1 of 2 slots occupied, max. 32 GB
Brandish
14.00 inch 16:ix, 1920 10 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO3B3D, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.ii Base of operations PCH
Storage
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 256 GB
, One thousand.2 2280, SSD, 174 GB gratis
Weight
one.541 kg ( = 54.36 oz / three.4 pounds), Power Supply: 334 yard ( = 11.78 oz / 0.74 pounds)
Notation: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including brandish panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Case - the HP EliteBook in a new look
The elegant argent aluminum case of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 looks very different to its predecessor (HP EliteBook 840 G4). The display cover has a contrasting edge at the top and the new HP logo emphasizes the elegant design. The new EliteBook 840 looks more angular, every bit the rounded corners at the dorsum of the base have disappeared. The business organization notebook appears cleaner and of higher quality - both in wait and experience. Its perfect workmanship is but as convincing every bit its stability - you need to apply strong pressure to warp the base unit. The display encompass is easier to warp but is still acceptable. The force per unit area test shows that the case gives style slightly in the center of the base unit, only this is no reason for criticism. We would like to praise the display embrace for not showing any waves on the screen nether pressure.
Opening the device is quite easy and can exist done with one paw. Despite the smoothen hinges, the brandish hardly wobbles when typing. Optically, the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is very convincing and small features such equally the webcam embrace prove that the manufacturer has also paid attention to functionality.
Size Comparison
Except for the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, all comparing devices accept very similar footprints. With a width of 32.6 cm (~12.8 in) and a depth of 23.4 cm (~9.1 in), the HP EliteBook 840 G5 does non take up too much space. The device is also relatively slim at 17.9 mm (~7.0 in) and does non appear bulky. The weight of our test unit of measurement is average for our comparison devices at about ane.five kg (~3.iii lbs). The Acer TravelMate P648 is a bit heavier at i.seven kg (~3.7 lbs). The power supply of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 adds another 334 grams (~11.7 oz) to the packet.
❌
Connectivity - HP 840 G5 has USB Type-C but no card reader
The port selection of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is skillful and bad at the same time. Only permit u.s.a. outset with the positive: Finally, the HP EliteBook 840 offers a USB Type-C port, which not only supports image output simply can also supply the device with power. The ports are positioned on the sides of the device, although about of them have been placed on the right side. Aside from the already mentioned USB Type-C port, the device also has two conventional USB 3.1 ports (one on each side). The notebook also offers an HDMI port and an Ethernet connector. On the right side you will also observe the proprietary docking station port, which enables you to easily connect to all devices at work. There is a Micro-SIM slot, but our exam unit does not accept a suitable WWAN module.
What nosotros cannot empathise is why HP has removed the SD card reader. Devices have sometimes been equipped with a microSD, but even this seems to have been deemed unnecessary hither. Other well-known manufacturers take done information technology earlier, however - and it works. So the finish user is left to dabble around with adapters - USB ports are still bachelor after all.
Communication
The wireless communication is taken care of by a 2x2 dual-band Ac-Wi-Fi module from Intel, which also supports Bluetooth 4.2. During our measurements, which accept place in ideal conditions, our examination unit managed to attain very expert results. Nosotros measured an average transfer rate of 523 Mbit/s when sending and 644 Mbit/southward when receiving. HP has managed to improve the device's performance compared to its predecessor, and the fifth-generation EliteBook 840 also does well when confronted with its comparing devices. The Ethernet port offers an culling network connection and tin transmit information at up to 1 Gbit/south (sending and receiving). Both network connectors work reliably and nosotros did not encounter any bug during our menstruum of testing.
If you want to use the device to surf while on the go, you will have to add a suitable WWAN module. There is a costless space for it side by side to the Wi-Fi module.
Security
Specially concern users rely strongly on their device's security features. Like its predecessor, the HP EliteBook 840 G5 offers a nice pick including a fingerprint reader, a SmartCard reader and the well-known slot for a security lock. Apart from the webcam, the EliteBook 840 G5 also has an infrared camera, which ways information technology supports authentication via face up recognition. After an like shooting fish in a barrel setup, a quick await at the login screen will give you firsthand admission to your Windows account. HP has non only thought of hardware, still, and information technology has equipped our device with a variety of security programs including HP SureStart and HP Client Security, which enables y'all to manage all settings relevant to security.
Accessories
Autonomously from the device itself and its 65-watt power supply, the box merely contains the obligatory safety and warranty information. If y'all would like additional accessories, you will take to purchase these separately. This includes the HP docking station with which you can easily connect the notebook to a good number of peripheral devices. The HP UltraSlim docking station costs some other $135.
Maintenance
Maintenance piece of work is relatively piece of cake despite the missing maintenance hatch. Although you take to remove the unabridged bottom of the base unit, the HP EliteBook 840 G5 does not make this as well hard. We would withal recommend using a plastic lever to avoid damaging the base of operations unit. Once the bottom is removed, you tin can admission all the important components. It is also easy to add a WWAN module, as all cables are already in place. Overall, the notebook is quite clearly synthetic. Out examination unit has a gratuitous slot for a 2nd RAM module.
Warranty
Buyers volition receive a 36-month express warranty for parts and labor. You tin also upgrade to a five-yr on-site service (HP Care Pack).
Please come across our Guarantees, Return Policies and Warranties FAQ for land-specific information.
Input Devices - comfortable keyboard and a practiced touchpad
Keyboard
Non only the HP EliteBook 840 G5 has been redesigned - its chiclet keyboard has also been given an overhaul. The keys have a prissy size at 16 x 15 mm (~0.6 x 0.59 in) and their matte surface offers plenty grip for fast typing. The keyboard nevertheless has crisp feedback, which is accompanied by good travel, and it remains protected from drops of h2o. Unlike Dell or Lenovo, the keys of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 are flat and exercise not take a conic shape. The pointer keys (upward and down) are a little hard to use and you are more likely to mistype due to their size.
Overall, we are pleased with the keyboard and the lettering is very easy to read. The device is also equipped with white backlighting that tin exist regulated in two levels. Yous tin can adjust the backlighting in the BIOS, past setting a timeout for the keyboard backlighting (five, x, 30, 60 or 300 seconds). If you lot do not similar timers, you lot can deactivate the characteristic. Backlighting tin can be turned on and off with a key combination.
Touchpad/PointStick
The touchpad is college and wider than its predecessor's was and now measures 11 10 6 cm (4.iii 10 two.3 in) while the one-time version was 10 x 5.5 cm (~3.9 10 2.1 in). For this increase in size, HP had to get rid of the lesser mouse keys, which turns the touchpad into a ClickPad. The input area is smooth and the device reacted precisely to our inputs in all areas - even the corners. The ii integrated mouse keys make a tranquillity clicking dissonance. The touchpad appears to be of loftier quality and fits nicely to the device'south general impression.
Another characteristic of the HP EliteBook 840 G5, which the competition from Lenovo and Dell besides features, is a point stick. With a little do, this enables you to navigate rapidly. The accompanying plastic keys above the ClickPad appear a petty rickety, however. Compared to the overall concept, aluminum keys would have been a better choice.
Display - IPS for the EliteBook 840 G5
HP has made only IPS displays bachelor for the HP EliteBook 840 G5, which offer a significant improvement compared to TN panels. If you look at the technical specifications, yous can encounter that EliteBooks will likewise exist available with a touch display. But it is not clear whether this choice is limited to certain regions. The matte console in our test unit of measurement comes from AU Optronics and offers a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. This results in a pixel density of 157 PPI. During our measurements, the screen reached an average brightness of 387 cd/k², which places the HP EliteBook 840 G5 in second place behind the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (533 cd/m²). Only cheers to its low black value (0.25), the display still offers the best contrast ratio (1656:1).
The brightness distribution is not the best at 87%, but we did not detect any bothersome shadowing which would signal irregular illumination. We did notice slight clouding in the peak left corner, simply this does not influence everyday office use. The EliteBook 840 G5 does non employ PWM to regulate display effulgence - proficient news.
| 360 cd/1000² | 396 cd/m² | 384 cd/m² | ||
| 369 cd/yard² | 414 cd/yard² | 391 cd/m² | ||
| 387 cd/m² | 390 cd/m² | 396 cd/yard² | ||
Distribution of brightness
AUO3B3D
10-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 414 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.iv cd/m² Minimum: 33.7 cd/m²
Effulgence Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 414 cd/chiliad²
Dissimilarity: 1656:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/thou²)
ΔE Color five.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.iii
ΔE Greyscale vi.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
88.ane% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll one.6.three 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll two.two.0 3D)
88.ii% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
lx.2% Display P3 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA AUO3B3D, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 LP140QH2-SPB1, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, 1920x1080, fourteen.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, 1920x1080, xiv.00 | Dell Breadth 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 B140QAN02.0, 2560x1440, xiv.00 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandish | xviii% | 2% | -7% | 7% | 41% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | lx.2 | 72.8 21% | 66.1 10% | 55.viii -7% | 65.4 9% | 87.7 46% | 67.2 12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.ii | 97.9 11% | 84.8 -iv% | 80.vii -9% | 92.3 5% | 100 13% | 90.8 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.3 | 74.1 21% | 62 i% | 57.vii -6% | 65.8 7% | 99.9 63% | 66.iv 8% |
| Response Times | 10% | 21% | 18% | iii% | -25% | xvi% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Greyness 80% * | 42.4 ? | 38.iv ? ix% | 36 ? 15% | 39 ? 8% | 40.8 ? four% | 59.ii ? -40% | 38 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 28.iv ? 10% | 23.two ? 27% | 23 ? 27% | 31.2 ? 1% | 34.4 ? -ix% | 25 ? 21% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||||
| Screen | -5% | -6% | -54% | 6% | xxx% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 414 | 352 -xv% | 291 -xxx% | 346 -16% | 344 -17% | 578 40% | 275 -34% |
| Effulgence | 387 | 343 -11% | 296 -24% | 317 -18% | 321 -17% | 533 38% | 253 -35% |
| Effulgence Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 84 -3% | 86 -1% | 85 -2% | 84 -3% | 85 -ii% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.46 -84% | 0.32 -28% | 0.86 -244% | 0.32 -28% | 0.38 -52% | 0.25 -0% |
| Dissimilarity | 1656 | 765 -54% | 909 -45% | 402 -76% | 1075 -35% | 1521 -8% | 1100 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | iii.3 40% | four.iii 22% | viii.64 -57% | two.half-dozen 53% | 1.9 65% | 3.49 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | ix.9 | 7.3 26% | 7.5 24% | thirteen.58 -37% | 7.8 21% | 3.8 62% | 6.77 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | two.3 | 0.eight 65% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 5.3 17% | four.three 33% | 11.24 -76% | 2.six 59% | 3 53% | iv.91 23% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.62 84% | 2.28 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 7811 83% | 6452 101% | 6529 100% | 12530 52% | 7050 92% | 6377 102% | 6271 104% |
| Colour Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.9 | 68.4 20% | 55.46 -3% | 52 -nine% | 65.82 xvi% | 88.8 56% | 59 4% |
| Color Infinite (Percent of sRGB) | 88.i | 98 11% | 84.77 -4% | 80 -9% | 92.27 5% | 100 14% | 91 iii% |
| Total Boilerplate (Program / Settings) | eight% / 2% | 6% / -ane% | -14% / -35% | 5% / 5% | fifteen% / 25% | viii% / three% |
* ... smaller is better
The image quality is acceptable ex-works, but the EliteBook 840 G5 has a meaning blue cast. The measured DeltaE 2000 deviation is as well style likewise high. Calibration improves this and reduces the DeltaE 2000 deviation as well every bit the blueish bandage. You can observe our ICC profile available for download above. The colour-space coverage is decent at 88.1% of the sRGB and 56.nine% of the AdobeRGB colour space. The competition from Dell and Lenovo offers significantly better results. Compared to the HP EliteBook 840 G4, the 5th-generation shows visible improvements.
The matte brandish surface and the good effulgence are swell conditions for outdoor use. You tin utilize the device outdoors when the sun is shining, although we would recommend finding a spot in the shade. Here, you tin can piece of work freely as the matte surface prevents bothersome reflections. To be even better equipped for outdoor use, the manufacturer also offers special displays with up to 700 cd/m².
Display Response Times
ℹ
Brandish response times testify how fast the screen is able to change from one colour to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and tin cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Blackness to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rising ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ xiii.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows boring response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are improve. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Greyness to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.4 ms ... rising ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.six ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms autumn | ||
| The screen shows wearisome response rates in our tests and will exist unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » threescore % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally exist undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is also low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM non detected |  | ||
| In comparing: 52 % of all tested devices do not utilize PWM to dim the brandish. If PWM was detected, an boilerplate of 22039 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The viewing-angle test of the Total HD panel is very convincing and the test image can be seen very well from about all angles. There are slight changes in colour in the four corner images, but this will non lead to whatsoever limitations in everyday use.
Performance - the Cadre i5-8250U is the minimum
Nigh users will exercise fine with the operation that our exam configuration can offer. Although HP does have the fifth-generation EliteBook 840 G5 bachelor with the older Intel Core i5-7200U as an entry-level version, we would suggest going for the Intel Core i5-8250U, which our unit of measurement is equipped with. The advantage in performance due to the double corporeality of cores is noticeable even in everyday use. Our 8 GB of RAM is also sufficient and can be expanded to upwardly to 32 GB if necessary. The device has two RAM slots and neither is soldered on. Overall, the components in our test unit of measurement work together nicely, which the LatencyMon results confirm.
Processor
The processor is the well-known Intel Core i5-8250U, which is now used in many devices and is the successor of the Intel Cadre i5-7200U. It has a TDP of 15 watts and has iv physical cores that tin can work up to eight threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 1.6 GHz and tin can be overclocked to upwards to 3.iv GHz depending on the load. The HP EliteBook 840 G5 reaches similar results to the Lenovo ThinkPad T480s in the single-cadre benchmark only cannot quite keep up with information technology in our multithread test. This is due to the higher TDP limit. The HP EliteBook 840 G5 still has skillful results compared to the form boilerplate. It is interesting to see the results of the HP EliteBook 840 G4, every bit this is equipped with the Intel Core i5-7200U. Due to this difference in performance, we would not recommend buying the HP EliteBook 840 G5 equipped with the older i5 processor.
You tin can find further benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-8250U hither.
The expert cooling system means that the device can piece of work chop-chop even under abiding load. The HP EliteBook 840 G5 reaches 582 points in the first round of our Cinebench R15 Multi loop. Due to the perpetual thermal load, the results drop continuously over the next x rounds, until they settle downwards to effectually 505 points. This equates to a loss in performance of 13%, which is yet acceptable.
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Scrap
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of grade Office (75.8 - 230, northward=122, last two years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Boilerplate of class Office (196 - 1614, due north=127, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-Thousand-73T0 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Cinebench R11.five | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Average of class Office (0.32 - 2.67, north=16, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (0.91 - 1.79, north=35) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Boilerplate of class Role (1.88 - 16.six, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Boilerplate Intel Cadre i5-8250U (3.15 - 7.76, n=35) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (9139 - 11143, n=3, last two years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-8250U (5163 - 8153, n=13) | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of grade Office (38477 - 46918, n=three, concluding 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (11245 - 28932, n=13) | |
| JetStream i.1 - Total Score | |
| Boilerplate of class Office (101.three - 305, n=25, last two years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (151.5 - 256, n=78) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Boilerplate of class Office (16762 - 65503, due north=36, concluding ii years) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Average Intel Cadre i5-8250U (22772 - 35817, due north=54) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (986 - 1532, due north=59) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Average of class Role (613 - 2170, n=129, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8044
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7179 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
25723 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7756 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Unmarried 32Bit
5519
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19335
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
5.96 Points
Cinebench R11.five OpenGL 32Bit
39.89 fps
Cinebench R11.v CPU Unmarried 64Bit
ane.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
half-dozen.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
38.46 fps
Cinebench R11.five CPU Single 32Bit
1.46 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
43.64 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
583 Points
Help
Organization Operation
The overall system functioning of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is fast and we encountered no issues. Equally you lot tin can run into from the PCMark criterion results, our test sample even managed to beat out the Lenovo ThinkPad T480s, although this offered significantly meliorate CPU operation (multithread). During our test period, the EliteBook 840 G5 showed slap-up organization performance and we enjoyed working on this laptop.
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Breadth 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Boilerplate of course Role (1275 - 5686, northward=l, concluding 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Boilerplate Intel Cadre i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-Thou-73T0 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Boilerplate Intel Cadre i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-Chiliad-73T0 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Boilerplate of course Office (2201 - 5695, n=46, concluding 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Average of course Part (1900 - 5933, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3358 - 4081, n=67) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average of class Office (2994 - 9512, n=115, concluding 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3851 - 6653, n=67) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3652 points | |
| PCMark viii Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4726 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4832 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2429 points | |
| Help | ||
Storage Devices
The storage device comes from Toshiba and offers 256 GB of infinite. Minus the system requirements, this leaves the user with most 174 GB available for free use. The Chiliad.2 SSD uses the fast NVMe protocol, which makes it speedier than regular SSDs that but use a SATA interface. However, our SSD could but convince us in its read rates during our test, although these do not fit to the manufacturer specifications from Toshiba (read: 2700 MB/s, write: 1050 MB/south). Its write rates were closer to SATA speeds. We assume that this is due to an consequence with the drivers which can still be dealt with. A futurity BIOS update might as well improve the SSD'south performance a fiddling.
Only this does non mean that the performance is bad. Yous will not notice the "low" write rates in everyday utilise. We were pleased with the 4K read rate, which is around 30 MB/s. The kick times will benefit from this, every bit this is when many pocket-size files have to exist loaded.
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Sequential Read: 1929 MB/due south
Sequential Write: 340 MB/south
4K QD32 Write: 351.3 MB/s
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2613 MB/s
CDM 5/half-dozen Write Seq Q32T1: 359.6 MB/south
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 253.one MB/s
CDM five/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 358 MB/s
CDM v Read Seq: 1937 MB/due south
CDM 5 Write Seq: 353.two MB/southward
CDM 5/six Read 4K: xxx.67 MB/s
CDM v/half dozen Write 4K: 92.8 MB/s
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Sequential Read: 1611MB/south
Sequential Write: 339MB/s
Admission Time Read: 0.321ms
Access Time Write: 0.053ms
Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 takes care of the graphics section and tin take a burden off the processor when displaying high-resolution videos thanks to its integrated hardware encoder. In the 3DMark comparison, the HP EliteBook 840 G5 can trounce the Lenovo ThinkPad T480s once again. Functioning can be increased fifty-fifty more past adding a 2d RAM module. Withal, the dual-channel mode cannot create miracles. If you require college 3D performance, you should look for a device that is equipped with a dedicated graphics bill of fare - the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is also available with the detached GPU AMD Radeon RX 540.
You can find further benchmarks for the Intel UHD Graphics 620 here.
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Role (3280 - 30980, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Boilerplate Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 11437, n=222) | |
| Dell Breadth 7480 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-Thou-73T0 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of form Office (449 - 8114, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 1444, n=210) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Operation GPU | |
| Average of grade Role (599 - 11538, due north=126, final 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 2006, north=241) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| 3DMark xi Performance | 1791 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 61742 points | |
| 3DMark Deject Gate Standard Score | 7535 points | |
| 3DMark Burn Strike Score | 941 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 440 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 364 points | |
| Help | ||
Gaming Performance
The low 3D operation of the Intel UHD Graphics 620 is non enough to display enervating games smoothly. If you are looking for a device that y'all tin play games on, you might want to take a await at the version of the HP EliteBook 840 G5 that offers a dedicated graphics carte du jour.
Emissions - a quiet HP 840
System Noise
Without load, the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is completely silent and we did not hear the usual gyre whine in our exam unit, either. But nether load does the pocket-size cooling fan set to piece of work and reach a maximum book of 35.2 dB(A). This makes our examination unit a lilliputian quieter than the Lenovo ThinkPad T480s. Still, the devices from Fujitsu and Dell are even quieter than our examination unit.
Racket Level
| Idle | 28.eight / 28.viii / 33.one dB(A) | |
| Load | 35.2 / 35.ii dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) l dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Hard disk Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-Grand-73T0 Hard disk drive Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -ane% | 6% | -two% | 8% | 0% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 28.9 -0% | 28.2 2% | 31 -viii% | 28.ix -0% | xxx.6 -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 28.9 -0% | 28.2 two% | 31 -8% | 28.6 1% | 28.9 -0% | 30.6 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28.nine -0% | 28.2 2% | 31 -8% | 28.vi 1% | 28.nine -0% | xxx.6 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.1 | 28.ix 13% | 28.2 fifteen% | 31 6% | 28.6 14% | 32.5 2% | 31 6% |
| Load Average * | 35.2 | 36.ix -five% | 31.ii 11% | 33.5 five% | xxx.2 14% | 35.ane -0% | 34.v 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.ii | 38.9 -eleven% | 33 six% | 33.7 4% | 31.2 11% | 35.1 -0% | 32.4 8% |
* ... smaller is amend
Temperature
The HP EliteBook 840 G5 has good case temperatures and just reaches 39.five °C (~103.1 °F) under load. All other comparison devices become a lot hotter and often attain surface temperatures of fifty °C (~122 °F) and more than. The temperatures are great on the inside, also. The processor reached a maximum of 83 °C (~181.iv °F) in our load test. The Intel Core i5-8250U also clocks at a good rate of ii.iv GHz, which is significantly higher than the base rate of i.vi GHz. However, the processor cannot keep this up when the CPU and GPU are put under load at the same time, as both have to share the TDP of 15 watts. The CPU therefore but reaches an boilerplate clock rate of ane.4 GHz in the stress test (Prime95 and FurMark). The continuous load does not affect 3D performance negatively.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 36.half dozen °C = 98 F Average: 32 °C = xc F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 39.5 °C = 103 F Boilerplate: 31.5 °C = 89 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 33 °C = 91 F | Room Temperature xix.6 °C = 67 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 23.8 °C = 75 F Boilerplate: 23.two °C = 74 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 24.seven °C = 76 F Boilerplate: 24 °C = 75 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 22.seven °C = 73 F | Room Temperature 20.1 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the form Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the boilerplate of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.ii to 62.5 °C for the course Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.five °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.two °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.eight F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The boilerplate temperature of the palmrest area of like devices was 27.viii °C / 82 F (+1.8 °C / 3.ii F).
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Hard disk Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-G-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estrus | -10% | -2% | -four% | -eighteen% | -15% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 36.6 | 50.i -37% | 42.half dozen -16% | 37 -1% | 39 -seven% | 52.vi -44% | 39.i -7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.five | 46.1 -17% | 34.4 13% | 39.four -0% | 47.2 -19% | 48.2 -22% | 35 eleven% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.viii | 22.ii seven% | 25.1 -v% | 25.9 -nine% | 27.six -16% | 23.6 one% | 29.4 -24% |
| Idle Lesser * | 24.7 | 22.six 9% | 24.6 -0% | 25.six -4% | 32 -thirty% | 23 7% | 27.viii -13% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The two stereo speakers are positioned higher up the keyboard. This means that the sound output is non blocked or reflected by a tabular array. Due to the device's small size, the membranes do non offer a lot of bass. Highs and mids take center stage and there is nothing the Bang & Olufsen software can do about it. Nonetheless, the integrated speakers are suitable for audio manual and video-telephoning as speech output is clear and precise. Even at maximum volume we did not observe any distortions. For a better sound experience, we would nonetheless recommend using an external sound system that tin can be continued via the 3.5-mm audio jack.
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA sound analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.seven% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (ten.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only three.3% abroad from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | college highs - on average seven.1% college than median
(+) | highs are linear (iv.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is boilerplate (20.v% divergence to median)
Compared to aforementioned class
» 46% of all tested devices in this course were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of vii%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were amend, nine% like, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of iii%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 audio assay
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | virtually no bass - on boilerplate eighteen.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on boilerplate 5.ix% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (x.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs ii - xvi kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only iii.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (eight.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.ane% deviation to median)
Compared to same course
» 53% of all tested devices in this grade were improve, xi% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of seven%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of three%, average was xx%, worst was 65%
Frequency diagram in comparison (checkboxes can be turned on/off!)
Energy Management - the EliteBook is not an energy-saving wonder
Power Consumption
The HP EliteBook 840 G5 is not very energy-efficient. Although its consumption of three.2 - nine.5 watts while idling is still OK, it climbs upward to 65.5 watts for a brusk fourth dimension nether load. On average, the consumption settles down to effectually 36.two watts. The included power supply offers a maximum of 65 watts and tin supply sufficient power as the maximum consumption rate drops subsequently about 10 seconds. The Lenovo ThinkPad T480s cannot offer better rates, withal. It really consumes about 8% more energy with a similar configuration.
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, fourteen.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, xiv.00 | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, Hard disk drive Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, fourteen.00 | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, xiv.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -viii% | half-dozen% | 21% | fifteen% | -xviii% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | three.ii | 3.1 3% | iv.11 -28% | two.9 nine% | 4.32 -35% | 3.8 -xix% | 4.8 -50% |
| Idle Average * | 6.vi | 6.8 -3% | 7.87 -19% | 5.6 15% | 6.27 5% | viii.9 -35% | vii.ix -xx% |
| Idle Maximum * | ix.5 | ten.1 -6% | 8.74 8% | viii.15 xiv% | half-dozen.35 33% | xi.9 -25% | ten.7 -13% |
| Load Boilerplate * | 36.two | 48.iv -34% | 30.2 17% | 30.half-dozen xv% | 29.82 xviii% | 47.5 -31% | 35 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.6 | 67.1 -2% | 32.4 51% | 31 53% | 30.64 53% | 52.5 20% | 31.half-dozen 52% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtimes
The battery runtimes are not as good as the HP EliteBook 840 G5's contest. The l-Wh battery is not removable and can sustain the business device for about 7.5 hours during our Wi-Fi test. This is tight if you are hoping to manage a whole workday without having to recharge. The fast charging times offer a picayune consolation: It but takes just over 2 hours to fully recharge. Nosotros noticed that 3D performance is not as good on bombardment, but this is non very of import.
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 18h 58min | |
| WiFi Websurfing (EDGE 41.16299.248.0) | 7h 27min | |
| Large Cadet Bunny H.264 1080p | 6h 39min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 2h 36min |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, fifty Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, Hard disk drive Graphics 620, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 27% | -nine% | 24% | 39% | 11% | vii% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1138 | 782 -31% | 1155 1% | 1662 46% | 1328 17% | 1087 -4% | |
| H.264 | 399 | 721 81% | 490 23% | 591 48% | 566 42% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 447 | 537 xx% | 430 -4% | 571 28% | 719 61% | 519 16% | 672 50% |
| Load | 156 | 124 -21% | 117 -25% | 184 18% | 171 ten% | 106 -32% | 115 -26% |
Verdict - keen design, overhauled port selection and a lot of security features
Pros
+ expert looking, stable case
+ brilliant, matte IPS
+ no PWM
+ many security features
+ proficient arrangement operation
+ comfortable input devices
+ USB Type-C with Thunderbolt
+ example temperatures remain low
+ docking port
Cons
- display has a strong bluish cast ex-works
- SSD not as good as we expected
- average bombardment runtimes
- no card reader
- processor cannot reach its full potential
The HP EliteBook 840 G5 is a high-quality business device, now in its fifth generation. The successor of the HP EliteBook 840 G4 has been given a new design and an up-to-date Kaby Lake Refresh processor, although this cannot achieve its full potential. Buyers should also be aware of which configuration they purchase, every bit the HP EliteBook 840 G5 is too available with seventh-generation Intel processors.
Our test unit is equipped with an Intel Cadre i5-8250U, 8 GB of RAM and a 256-GB SSD, and the device provides very good organisation operation. HP has likewise decided to but offer IPS panels in this version, which has significant advantages. At a price of $1400, the device offers perfect workmanship, practiced performance and many security features, which are a must for any business laptop.
The new HP EliteBook 840 G5 is impressive with its fancy blueprint and perfect workmanship. The good input devices are just as important equally the many security features the EliteBook 840 G5 has to offer.
The HP EliteBook 840 G5 loses several points in the areas of power consumption and battery runtime. Its competition proves that it could exercise better. But if you do not have to deal with long stretches of time without admission to sockets, y'all volition be very pleased with the HP EliteBook 840 G5. Nosotros were a lot more bothered past the missing SD card reader, which does not make whatsoever sense. Luckily, the business organisation companion does offer a USB Type-C port that supports Thunderbolt.
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA - 2018-04-03 04/03/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade
Office - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
I was already interested in technology from an early historic period, and I was able to written report for my dream task equally an IT Systems Electronics Engineer. After, I started 12 years of military service, during which I learned a lot about applied science and constantly kept my cognition up to date with the latest developments. As I similar to share my knowledge, I found Notebookcheck was a very skillful opportunity for this. In addition, I as well piece of work a lot with water cooling and network security.
I completed my main's degree in translation at the University of Vienna a few years agone and have been working as a translator for English, High german and French ever since. I first started translating for Notebookcheck in 2017 and have learned more than almost computers than I ever imagined, and I take fifty-fifty become the person my family turns to for advice when it comes to consumer electronics. Other than that I also focus on everything connected to sustainability and renewable energy.
Sebastian Bade, 2018-04- half dozen (Update: 2019-03-20)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-EliteBook-840-G5-i5-8250U-SSD-Full-HD-Laptop-Review.295916.0.html
0 Response to "Hp 156 Hd Notebook Intel Core I5-8250u Processor Review"
Postar um comentário